🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 413+ reviews
Women ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

LSCN BY LASCANA - Bikini bottoms - rosa

★★★★★ 4.2 out of 5 (413 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$22
$36.67
Sale
✓ at no charge delivery on this item • Limited time offer

Rise : LowPattern : PlainArticle number : L8381I078-J11

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
fast Shipping
↩️
accessible Returns

📋 Product Description

LSCN BY LASCANA - Bikini bottoms - rosa

Rise : Low
Pattern : Plain
Article number : L8381I078-J11

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Women products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 1336207

Category: Women > Clothing > Swimwear

Original Price:$36.67 USD

Sale Price: $22 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 shipment & Returns

✓ at no charge distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.2
★★★★★
Based on 1552 reviews
MK​
Megan King ✓ Verified Purchase
8 months ago · Denver, CO
★★★★★
A+ quality
In daily use, it is uncomplicated to use which is good enough.​
32 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor ✓ Verified Purchase
4 months ago · Miami, FL
★★★★★
Fantastic product
This LSCN BY LASCANA - Bikini bottoms - rosa exceeded my expectations. really happy with it.
27 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green ✓ Verified Purchase
11 months ago · Charlotte, NC
★★★★★
Worth every penny
At first, it is practical and it’s fine overall. dispatch was normal.
47 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis ✓ Verified Purchase
3 months ago · San Antonio, TX
★★★★★
impeccable LSCN BY LASCANA - Bikini bottoms - rosa
It’s my first time buying this type of LSCN BY LASCANA - Bikini bottoms - rosa. Pretty satisfied.
29 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor ✓ Verified Purchase
2 months ago · Jacksonville, FL
★★★★★
fabulous LSCN BY LASCANA - Bikini bottoms - rosa!
I’ve only used the LSCN BY LASCANA - Bikini bottoms - rosa a short time, but it seems fine.
6 people found this helpful