🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 943+ reviews
Vintage ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller 

VS Pink pajama shorts

★★★★★ 4.7 out of 5 (943 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$16
$26.67
Sale
✓ at no charge delivery on this item • Limited time offer

Green satin leopard print shorts, leopard detailing, tender & comfort, worn a few times, still in excellent condition, stretchy waistband, size small

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment

↩️
straightforward Returns

📋 Product Description

VS Pink pajama shorts

Green satin leopard print shorts, leopard detailing, tender & comfort, worn a few times, still in fabulous condition, stretchy waistband, size small

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 1349697

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price:$26.67 USD

Sale Price: $16 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

✓ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.7
★★★★★
Based on 1471 reviews
EY
Elizabeth Young ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · Tulsa, OK
★★★★★
finest
At first, it does the job and it meets expectations.
5 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Nashville, TN
★★★★★
A must-have
I had no trouble using the VS Pink pajama shorts from day one.
25 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller ✓ Verified Purchase​
10 months ago · San Jose, CA
★★★★★
A+ quality
In daily use, the VS Pink pajama shorts performs as expected and I don’t regret it. Arrived on time.
8 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker
3 months ago · San Antonio, TX
★★★★★
outstanding VS Pink pajama shorts
The VS Pink pajama shorts doesn’t require special care to use.
42 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis ✓ Verified Purchase
8 months ago · Boston, MA
★★★★★
Exactly what I needed
Personally, the VS Pink pajama shorts works well enough so it’s acceptable. Packaging was straightforward.
23 people found this helpful