🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 748+ reviews
Toys ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Vintage Jax Set

★★★★★ 4.8 out of 5 (748 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12
$20
Sale
✓ at no charge delivery on this item • Limited time offer

This set was my grandmothers as a child and she is 101, the balls have harden over time. Smoke gratis home

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

📋 Product Description

Vintage Jax Set

This set was my grandmothers as a child and she is 101, the balls have harden over time. Smoke gratis home

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 2083693

Category: Toys > Vintage & Antique Toys > Games

Original Price:$20 USD

Sale Price: $12 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

✓ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 5400 reviews
NP
Nathan Phillips ✓ Verified Purchase
11 months ago · Jacksonville, FL
★★★★★
Absolutely impeccable
At first, the Vintage Jax Set does its job and it’s fine overall.​
32 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker ✓ Verified Purchase
5 months ago · San Antonio, TX

★★★★★
Exceptional quality
From my experience, the Vintage Jax Set does its job which is good enough. Packaging was uncomplicated.
47 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson ✓ Verified Purchase​
2 weeks ago · Portland, OR
★★★★★
Brilliant Vintage Jax Set
Personally, the Vintage Jax Set is user-friendly to use and it works for me. Works fine so far.
34 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · Omaha, NE
★★★★★
superb investment
I had no trouble using the Vintage Jax Set from day one.
10 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young ✓ Verified Purchase
8 months ago · Milwaukee, WI
★★★★★
So glad I bought this
To be fair, it feels solid enough so it’s acceptable.
3 people found this helpful